Round Table: The Price is Right

May 15th, 2008 Jason O Posted in Gaming, Military 3 Comments »

What follows are some pretty significant Call of Duty 4 spoilers. As the game came out last year I’m not feeling terribly guilty about this but if you haven’t finished the single-player campaign you should be forewarned.

I don’t know why, but the characters I find most interesting in fiction are so often people I don’t think I would like if I met them in real life.

On that note, I present to you Captain William Price of the British SAS and a supporting character in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Captain Price is the commanding officer of Sergeant “Soap” MacTavish, the primary character controlled by the player for the British missions in the game. Price acts as both a mentor to the player’s character and a guide for the player to keep them from getting lost. He’s stern, no nonsense, and not above using morally questionable means in order to achieve his mission. The story set-up would have you believe that the SAS is busy trying to clean-up a mess caused by the Americans, but as it turns out during a portion of the game where you play as a much younger William Price the Americans only had the problems they did because of a mistake made by Price and his former commanding officer. It’s a double twist with a little salt around the rim that makes the Call of Duty 4 story so interesting.

When we first meet Price he is the insult throwing and hard charging commander of the SAS team that represents the British portion of the missions. On the very first outing Price orders the elimination of a tanker crew, who may or may not be terrorists, and even has his team kill sailors in their sleep. If that’s not uncomfortable enough for you, the main character, the aforementioned “Soap”, walks in as Price is finishing up an interrogation. The bloodied terrorist and the pliers in Price’s hands are damning evidence. Look, I’m all over the map when it comes to the torture debate but I know it’s one thing to talk about it in the neat and tidy world we live in and something totally different for the people who may be putting their lives on the line. No matter how you feel about it though, that scene struck me with that same feeling of discomfort as killing the tanker crew in their sleep. Sure, that was probably a very bad man but the implications just gave me a chill.

At this point in the game I’ve developed a grudging respect for Price. I don’t know that I approve of his methods but I’m starting to get a feel for how far he’s willing to go in order to protect his homeland. Oddly, just about when I’m at the point where I wonder how he could become this way I get a mission where you play as Price when he was much younger.

Seriously, here is one of those rare moments where it’s like the developers look into the future and read my mind. “Hmmm, we’re going to have a lot of people wondering why Price is so hardcore. Maybe we should expand on his character?”

We get to play along as Price and his commanding officer botch an assassination attempt that leaves the main antagonist alive who would later cause so much trouble in present day. Not only do they assume ripping a guy’s arm off with a .50 caliber rifle will prove fatal, they barely hang around long enough to confirm the villain is indeed going to bleed out like they presume he will. They’re more than happy to declare him a confirmed kill and then race through the bombed out suburbs of Somewhere-vistan only to have Price’s commander badly wounded and the two narrowly escaping with their lives.

No doubt, before this, the story was simply the SAS trying to stop a nuclear terrorist threat, but for Price this is redemption. He screwed up big and he knows it. No one ever says anything about it, but the facts are clear to the player. Again, the story is strong enough that it doesn’t force feed these facts to the player. In the end, in their darkest hour, Price uses his last moments before death to slide his pistol to the player so that “Soap” can put an end to the megalomaniacal antagonist’s life.

In the real world I’ve known enough people in specialized military branches to understand they make tough choices most of us will never have to make. I’ve known people who were Green Berets and quite a few former Army Rangers and they’ve all had to be tough bastards at one point or another. I respected these men and the choices they’ve had to make. Facing this fictitious character who also is faced with tough choices, it’s the uncompromising way he goes about his job that makes me so uncomfortable with him. Does he regret his actions? Does he regret what he has to do in the name of his country? Not once does he show an ounce of remorse, he is all business from beginning to bloody end. By the end of the game that grudging respect turned to admiration, but I still couldn’t help feel that he and I would never hang out at the pub. The cost of his decisions cost him a piece of his humanity, making him something that could never be defined as “normal”. A compelling character far from the wise and seasoned mentor so often given to us in most stories. Flawed and haunted in the present by the ghosts of his past, he still retains a laser-like focus on the mission when he had every right to despair. None of it changes that he makes choices that would make it hard to look at yourself in the mirror in the morning.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Why doesn’t our military have the best?

May 23rd, 2007 Jason O Posted in Military Comments Off

I just want to preface this by saying this will have nothing to do with the War in Iraq, though it is probably related in some way.

On October of 2005, the US Army cancelled development of the XM8 Assault Rifle. While I have some questions about the effectiveness of the weapon versus the standard M16, seeing a demonstration of an XM8 buried in sand and then picked up and fired just fine made a believer out of me. Not like the M16 that will jam if you use harsh language on it.

Instead of the XM8, the US Army is giving more troops the M4A1 Carbine and the US Marine Corps are now issuing the M16A4. Both of these weapons are modernized versions of a rifle that was invented over 40 years ago. While the AR-15 family of rifles, from which both the M4A1 and M16A4 are descended, are solid weapons they have well known documented problems when it comes to reliability. Despite the update, various US special forces units are procuring weapons such as the FN SCAR or the HK 416. The reason being that the M4A1 just doesn’t cut it.

What I find perplexing is that many other militaries have developed their own weapons in the past 4 decades that offer advantages over the M16. Ballistics haven’t evolved all that much, but weapon durability and reliability have been significantly improved. Even Iran and India have developed their own weapons, so what excuse does the US have for fielding essentially the same rifle they’ve used since before I was born? What excuse does Colt have for not fixing a known design flaw with a weapon that could mean life or death for our soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Military funerals are the toughest

September 27th, 2006 Jason O Posted in Culture, Military Comments Off

On my “to do” list last week was attend the funeral of my wife’s grandfather.

I really didn’t know the man that well, but as it turns out he was a World War II veteran, something I did not know about him. I knew he was an extremely peaceful man and I couldn’t imagine him as a soldier fighting in the Phillipines, but there you have it. He was so sick of guns by the time that he returned that he never wanted to touch one again. He didn’t have anything against them, but he also never wanted to use one. He won a shotgun in some kind of fair and ended up giving it to his son simply because he knew he would never use it.

Military funerals are one of the worst kinds because they serve so effectively as gut-wrenching emotional moments, the exact kind of scenario I am so very bad at. There is the 21 gun salute, which always seems to most startle the people who have served in the military. My brother-in-law jerked at each shot, and he’s served in Iraq and Kuwait. Then they play “Taps”, which is sure to draw tears from anyone who still has a dry eye. No one has ever managed to top a more mournful melody from a traditional military musical instrument. Finally they present the flag to the most relevant survivor and utter the words “On behalf of a grateful nation” which acts like an emotional punch in the gut.

That’s a lot of ceremony for someone who served over 60 years ago. There is something very touching about that kind of honor being shown towards a person who was conscripted, served willingly, and then came home to resume their lives. I think it says a lot about our country and the value we still place on service and self sacrifice.

That was a very tough weekend as emotions ran high for someone I had no emotional investment in. Still, even I was touched by the final gesture given to a World War II veteran.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Words cannot express…

August 25th, 2005 Jason O Posted in Military Comments Off

Gates of Fire - Combat in Iraq

Holy crap!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button