So Mass Effect is just porn?

January 16th, 2008 Jason O Posted in Culture, Gaming, Media Follies 3 Comments »

I saw this dreadful article yesterday where the author talks about sex acts in Mass Effect and how he was concerned because his son already gets “too emotional” with his James Bond video games.

Not too long after I read the article I found myself in a store and I picked up a copy of Mass Effect just to look at it (I didn’t have $60 committed for its purchase just then, so….) and sure enough, it’s rated “M”, which you could probably guess means “Mature”.

At last count, there were over 800 comments to that hackish piece of work. The only thing that really need to be commented is that it is ridiculous to complain about unsuitable content for children when a game is clearly not made for them. Do you take your kids to “R” movies and complain there is nudity?

The whole thing is stupid and shameful. You can complain about content if you want, but don’t complain about its effects on kids. People still act like we’re peddling these games to 10 years olds.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Seattle Christmas Trees revisited

December 13th, 2006 Jason O Posted in Culture, Media Follies, Religion 1 Comment »

Major hat tip to Josh of Cathode Tan for posting the link.

So there is more to the Seattle Airport story than what was first reported. I know, I know, it’s so hard to believe that the news media reported a story without all the facts. I’m a chump for ever thinking they do.

According to this story, the original action was that the Rabbi in question was going to sue if the Seattle Airport did not put up a Menorah in addition to Christmas trees, at which point the airport figured it was safer to just not do anything rather than face further accusations of exclusion.

I’m not sure if this is really any better to tell the truth. Again, the Christmas tree is not a Christian symbol, nor is it associated in any way with the Christian religion other than having the name “Christmas” attached to it. Then again, is Christian Slater a Christian because of his name?

If the airport had Nativity scenes then I could understand. The Christmas tree is a nice neutral symbol of the holidays. Traditionally it is put up the day after Thanksgiving and taken down sometime before New Years. I still think the Rabbi was being a putz about the whole thing, and bringing forth a lawsuit was just outright wrong. I think threatening to sue to get your way is pretty low. He still has a valuable lesson to learn in this situation.

On the other hand, I am miffed that the facts of this incident were so badly jumbled by the press.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Daily Show increases cynicism? Not likely!

June 28th, 2006 Jason O Posted in Media Follies, Politics 1 Comment »

There’s a great piece defending the Daily Show and some of the commenters make good points as well. For those who don’t know, there was a survey recently that claimed the Daily Show was making college students more cynical about politics.

No, I think politics is making students more cynical about politics. Though I do think the Daily Show is probably increasing cynicism in the mainstream media (MSM), which I support because I think the MSM is out of control these days anyway. I like the Daily Show, not that I watch much TV, and I like John Stewart. Mr. Stewart is no fan of President Bush and yet doesn’t suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome. When he starts beating on Bush my eyes don’t spontaneously roll into the back of my head and my ears don’t slam shut. People who slam Mr. Stewart for slamming Bush just aren’t paying attention. The man has an opinion and he’s not afraid to think about it. He’s also given Bush credit where it is due, proof that he’s not blinded by his dislike. Stewart and company are also equal opportunity lampooners, which really is a full-time job and that is why the Daily Show has been so successful.

Honestly, the Daily Show is something I consider part of the larger debate going on in this country and despite its comedic intentions it does a better job in said debate than most politicians and almost all of the media. Considering it is not supposed to be a “real” news show, I think its a sad testament about the state of our politicians and news media. If things weren’t so bad the Daily Show wouldn’t be doing so good.

Causes cynicism? More like capitalizes on it.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Da Vinci Code and the News

May 17th, 2006 Jason O Posted in Media Follies Comments Off

I’ve been meaning to post something about the Da Vinci Code from my perspective as a Christian and how I feel that there is a big overreaction to it. Part of that response was that I was going to attempt to talk about the content of the story without giving away any spoilers. You see, the Da Vinci Code is not like Lord of the Rings. It has not been around for decades and not everyone has read the book that will go see the movie, so I figure the Statute of Spoiler Limitations has not yet passed.

However, on CNN today they gave away the whole controversy about Christ and what the Catholic Church is trying to cover up. I was just aghast. Yes there is a big to do out there, yes the Catholic Church is protesting, yes there is a lot of talk going on. I don’t know if this open discussion about the story will hurt ticket sales or not. I just found it to be extremely insensitive. Then again, I don’t expect anything less from the oblivious Mainstream Media anyway. Perhaps this is just par for the course.

This is probably just a minor sin on their part, but it just adds to the pile of grievances I have collected against them ever since I received an inside look at their world. Of course, the real news story behind the Da Vinci Code is that there is no story, the media just loves a circus and will create one when necessary. This is essentially the media trying to grab viewers and boost ratings by exploiting Dan Brown’s work and the protests of the Church.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The problem is not liberal bias…

March 8th, 2006 Jason O Posted in Media Follies No Comments »

Labels are a mixed bag when you get right down to it. The problem with using labels is that they often contort what the real issue is. When you label something or someone, the response by those that perceive the label, or even that which is being labeled, is often formed by their ideas of what that label represents.

For example, if I self-identify as a Christian, that label will get many responses. Someone who has had many negative encounters with Christians may perceive me as being a self-righteous, uptight, meddling, puritannical pain-in-the-ass, even if they know nothing about me. On the other hand, someone who has had positive encounters with Christians may think of me as an upstanding and honest citizen ready to help the community. Simply stated, it is a matter of perception.

So what does this have to do with the media and it’s liberal bias? Everything actually. The problem is that people focus too much on the liberal and not enough on the bias. See, the underlying problem I have with the media is not that they are predominantly liberal, I actually see that as an irrelevant point. However, that descriptor puts liberals on the defensive because when you start talking about “liberal bias”, you sound as though you are attacking a point of view. In some cases, that is actually true.

The mainstream media being liberal is not really hurting them, I think it’s the constant denial that they have a bias, liberal or otherwise, that is hurting them. They claim to be objective, but their accounts often omit or change facts that we might hear from people who are closer to the incidents they report. The world has shrunk considerably. Too often real people on the ground can substantiate or contradict news reports. We are finding that the news media is not giving us the whole story, and this is only getting worse as more people find themselves able to get the word out on their own.

The Opinionated Bastard had some good comments about responsibility in news journalism. His own take closely mirrors my encounters with the news media when I was still in law enforcement. Sensationalism has replaced integrity. We cannot rely on them to give us the facts, and the general public is becoming increasingly aware of it. Fox News, with it’s own bias, is too often reporting stories and facts we don’t see elsewhere. A major news organization is out there contradicting the stories of the old news dinosaurs. What does that say?

The news media would actually do a better job of just admitting its bias up front. That would help their readers gain perspective on the stories they report. Right now they claim objectivity, but readers aren’t buying it. On the other hand, so-called “Pajamas media” on the Internet are much more transparent of their bias. I may not always share another person’s point of view, but I much prefer it when they are honest with me about it.

Or perhaps it would be a big headstart if the mainstream media quit acting like it is their mission to tell us how the world is, just reported the facts, and let people decide for themselves. The constant drumbeat of “the public is too dumb to think for themselves” is likely the root of their problems.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button